From strategy to success: the role of operating models

I was looking at the Wilson Perumal website today.  This consulting company has some useful blogs … and thirteen on operating models.   I particularly liked one titled “Are you overlooking an essential part of your strategy”

The article states “When most people think of strategy, or the allocation of scarce resources, they focus on the external strategy—which customers to serve in what markets with what portfolio of products at what price points and with what supporting service levels. However, equally important, but often overlooked, is a company’s internal strategy or Operating Model—the coordinated collection of business & production capabilities, organization structure, assets, people, technology, partnerships and governance used to effectively deliver the market strategy.”

The article then includes an exhibit showing the role of an operating model in the journey from strategy to excellent outcomes.


This exhibit got me thinking.  Is operational excellence all you need to turn “Sound Strategy” (a good market strategy and a good operating model) into “Leading performance”.    My conclusion is no.

My reasoning is as follows.  When you have a new strategy, you need to develop a new target operating model to deliver the strategy.   I agree that both of these are needed for a “Sound Strategy”.  I also agree that too little attention is given to the target operating model in most strategy processes.   But even with a “Sound Strategy” you still only have a set of ideas and plans on paper.  To create the target operating model, you need a transformation process, consisting of a set of projects that will convert your current operating model to the target.

Once you have implemented the new target design, you have not yet implemented the strategy.  All you have done is set the organisation up so that it has the structure and capabilities and processes and …. that it needs to implement the strategy.  You still need to run the organisation well (“Operational Excellence”) to deliver the strategy.

In other words,  I don’t think Wilson Perumal have got this quite right.  My equations would be

Market Strategy + Target Operating Model = Sound Strategy

Sound Strategy + Excellent Transformation = Sound Organisation

Sound Organisation + Operational Excellence = Excellent Performance

What do you think?  Please comment.


About Andrew Campbell

Ashridge Executive Education Focus on strategy and organisation Almost retired!
This entry was posted in Design steps, Strategy and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to From strategy to success: the role of operating models

  1. Richard Rawling says:


    I think you are spot on here. Plans count for nought unless you have an effective process to activate. But therein lies the impact of culture (mindset), because it can derail everything. This is especially true at the Board – Executive interface because misalignment of mindset here can seriously weaken the leadership required to overcome potential cultural blockers. In terms of your equations, it may well be then that culture is a factor that modifies all three!

    Best regards R Richard Rawling Principal, Nous Group

    • andrew campbell says:

      Yes Richard culture is a modifier. We should take it into account when developing strategy both in the market strategy part and the operating model part. Culture will affect the transformation process. And culture will impact operational excellence. Of course the target operating model may require some changes to culture. This will mean some culture change initiatives in the transformation step … and some culture reinforcement initiatives in the operational excellence processes.

  2. Glad you enjoyed our article Andrew! And thanks for the discussion! Not to nitpick, but I would point out that our formula references an “Aligned” Operating Model, not a “Target” Operating Model. As you pointed out, identifying the target model isn’t enough. There has to be a transformation process to move to the target process. Our choice of the word “Aligned” rather than “Target” was meant to imply that the target operating model was implemented. Also, I would point out that we view a robust management system as a prerequisite for achieving Operational Excellence. A robust management system would require that the processes for translating strategy into execution (e.g. goals and targets, plans, metrics, roles & responsibilities, management of change, etc.) are established and implemented. Probably splitting hairs though. Bottom line is that you are absolutely correct that design, without a solid process for implementing it, is useless. That’s is why we use a multiplication sign. One without the other = zero.

    • andrew campbell says:

      Good point Christopher. Thank you for adding clarity. I think we are on the same page.

      I have a colleague, Stephen Bungay of “The Art of Action” fame, who has specialised on strategy execution, building on the ideas of “mission command” from the military. What I have realised is that his ideas presume an existing “aligned operating model”. As a result, there is another whole dimension to strategy execution which is the design of the target operating model (which you consider to be part of strategy work and I think I agree with you) and the transformation from the “as is” to the “target”, which is about projects and programme management and sequencing and …. I partly wrote this piece to bring out my thinking about the two types of execution – changing the operating model and operating the operating model.

  3. Peter Murchland says:

    Andrew – the article reminded me of:
    business strategy = market strategy + corporate strategy

    There are multiple ways that we can describe these activities, some of them arising from different heritages and different schools of thinking, but largely being descriptive of the same activities. That becomes evident when Chris explains his intended meaning for “aligned operating model”, which I had not fully appreciated.

    Your set of equations seems an effective means of conveying the critical elements (from my perspective).

  4. Alex Graham says:

    Hi Andrew & Richard,
    I very much enjoyed your posts and discussions, thank you.
    I’m thoughtful that designing and imbuing an organisation with Operational Excellence (rightly highlighted as mind-sets, rather than specific tools or techniques such as Lean, 6Sigma or Balanced Scorecard management etc) is in my experience a product of the transformation to the future state Target Operating Model rather than a subsequent addition. I believe this is because the key enablers in the cultural shift required to deliver Excellent Performance are often the elements of the Operating Model undergoing transformation. In simpler terms, Operational Excellence must explicitly be designed in to the Transformation to deliver Excellent Performance. So perhaps the equation is:
    Sound Strategy x (Excellent Transformation + Operational Excellence) = Excellent Performance

  5. andrew campbell says:

    Alex, I am not sure that I agree fully with what you are saying. Yes I do agree that the imbuing an organisation with an operational excellence capability is a design task and hence is part of target operating model design and the transformation needed to get from as is to target. But there is still a further element before you get to good performance – leading well and running the operations well. This is a different activity from the design and transformation activities. I find it really helpful to separate the task of designing from the task of running, just like you would in an IT function separate development from run.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s